What does audit and KYC coordination cover?
| Workstream | What we coordinate | Project output |
|---|---|---|
| Contract audit | Scope, provider communication and findings handoff | Audit report or agreed status record |
| Team KYC | Provider requirements and document preparation | KYC result or provider confirmation |
| Platform evidence | Submission-ready links and supporting details | Organized review package |
This service coordinates third-party work; it does not replace an auditor’s technical review or a KYC provider’s identity checks. We first identify the contracts, networks, team members and target platforms involved. That prevents a common mismatch: commissioning a review that does not cover the deployed contract or preparing a badge that a target platform does not request.
Before provider outreach, we build a kickoff checklist covering contract addresses, source-code or repository references, deployment status, project description, team contacts and the intended use of the audit or KYC result. We also ask whether you have a preferred auditor, an existing report or a specific launchpad requirement. Sensitive identity files are handled through a document route agreed with you before transfer.
This is a fit when a project needs an independent technical review, a team verification result, or both, and wants help coordinating the evidence path. If your immediate need is a platform profile rather than an audit, see CoinMarketCap listing, CoinGecko listing or the broader listings and verification service.
How do we match the audit and KYC evidence to your target?
| Decision | Check before provider selection |
|---|---|
| Audit scope | Which deployed contracts and functions need review? |
| Provider fit | Does the intended platform name or accept this provider’s work? |
| KYC purpose | Is the request about a named team, project entity or launchpad workflow? |
| Evidence format | Can the result be linked, published or submitted as requested? |
We start with the destination, not a generic badge. Tell us which data site or launchpad you plan to approach and share its request, if available. We compare that request with the proposed provider’s stated scope and the project’s current contract details. If the platform does not specify an auditor or format, we record that uncertainty and confirm the choice with you before coordination proceeds.
For audit matching, provide the network, contract address, deployment state, source-code reference and any prior review. For KYC matching, clarify who must be verified, what the result is intended to demonstrate and whether the provider can issue evidence suitable for sharing. Do not assume that a contract audit verifies a team, or that team KYC reviews code; they answer different questions.
A project with token changes, a migration or a rebrand should disclose that before the provider is selected. The audit scope and public references may need to reflect the current deployment. If the platform task also involves token data, coordinate it alongside circulating supply verification or contract migration and rebranding updates.
What do you receive from the audit and KYC coordination?
| Deliverable | Contents |
|---|---|
| Scope sheet | Target platform, requested outcome, contracts and team participants |
| Provider handoff | Agreed scope, contacts, required files and next actions |
| Evidence index | Report or KYC result references, dates supplied by the provider and sharing status |
| Submission pack | Relevant links, project details and supporting documents for the agreed destination |
| Status report | Open requests, completed handoffs and decisions awaiting your approval |
The purpose is a usable record, not a collection of disconnected files. We keep audit and KYC evidence distinct, label what each item demonstrates, and note which claims are supported by the provider’s materials. That makes it easier for your team to reuse accurate references across a platform submission, project website or launchpad application.
The exact contents depend on the work you authorize. An audit-only engagement can focus on contract scope, provider coordination and report handoff. A KYC-only engagement can focus on participant requirements, document preparation and result sharing. A combined engagement tracks both workstreams in parallel while keeping their evidence separate.
You remain responsible for confirming project facts and approving what is shared publicly. We do not rewrite an auditor’s conclusions or present a pending review as completed. Where the result is publishable, we help organize the report link and a concise description of its scope; where it is private, we prepare only the agreed submission materials.
How does the coordination process run?
| Phase | Your decision or input | Our coordination |
|---|---|---|
| Kickoff | Share target platform and project status | Return a kickoff checklist and identify missing inputs |
| Scope | Confirm contracts, team participants and intended evidence | Align the request with a suitable third-party provider |
| Review | Respond to provider questions and approve transfers | Track requests and keep audit and KYC workstreams distinct |
| Handoff | Approve the report or result references | Prepare the agreed platform submission package |
| Follow-up | Decide how to answer reviewer requests | Record responses and outstanding actions |
At kickoff, AEOTech uses a named scope review: we compare your target platform’s stated request with the contract addresses, team details and documents you provide. You receive the checklist before provider outreach, so missing materials and scope questions surface early rather than during the final submission.
During the review, one account contact tracks provider questions and your approvals. We record what was requested, what was supplied and what remains open. The provider conducts the technical audit or identity checks; our role is coordination, document organization and communication. We do not alter technical findings or make identity decisions.
Timing follows the completeness of your inputs, the provider’s review queue and any follow-up questions. Once the provider returns the result, we check that the handoff contains the agreed evidence and prepare the destination-specific package. For a launchpad application, we can align that package with launchpad listing support; for a CoinMarketCap community task, see community verification coordination.
What can data sites and launchpads decide independently?
| Outside our control | What to do |
|---|---|
| Provider or report eligibility | Check the destination’s current request before commissioning work |
| Submission review | Submit evidence that matches the requested format and project details |
| Badge display or profile status | Keep a record of the decision and any follow-up request |
An auditor’s report does not compel CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko or a launchpad to approve a profile: each reviewer applies its own current submission rules and may request different evidence. We verify the agreed handoff and track responses, but acceptance, badge display and listing status remain with those third parties.
Before authorizing provider work, ask the destination whether it requires a named auditor, a public report link, a particular KYC result or additional project documents. Save the answer with your kickoff materials. If the requirement is unclear, ask the platform directly and avoid describing a pending review as a completed audit or badge. This simple evidence check helps keep your submission accurate and reduces avoidable rework.
Prices
| Service | Price | Quote |
|---|---|---|
| Audit & KYC | on request |
Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.
How it works
- Share the destinationSend the data site or launchpad you are preparing for, plus any stated audit or KYC requirements.
- Complete the kickoff checklistProvide contract references, project status, team participants and existing reports. We identify missing inputs before contacting providers.
- Confirm provider and scopeReview the proposed work and document route. Provider outreach starts after you approve the scope.
- Track the reviewWe organize provider questions, your responses and the status of audit and KYC evidence.
- Prepare the handoffWe assemble the agreed report references and supporting materials for your selected platform or launchpad.
Frequently asked questions
What should I prepare before requesting an audit and KYC badge?
Prepare your target platform or launchpad, network, deployed contract address, source-code or repository reference, project links and any existing audit. For KYC, identify the people or entity involved and the intended use of the result. The kickoff checklist identifies any additional provider or destination requirements.
Does an audit report automatically get my project verified on CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap?
No. A report documents the scope and findings of the auditor’s work; platform verification is a separate review. The destination decides whether the evidence and provider meet its current requirements. We coordinate the agreed evidence handoff and can support related CoinGecko listing or CoinMarketCap listing work.
Can you coordinate KYC without commissioning a smart contract audit?
Yes. KYC and a smart contract audit are separate workstreams. If you need only a team verification result, we scope the participants, document requirements and intended destination without adding an audit request. We confirm the provider and sharing route with you before sensitive documents are transferred.
How long does audit and KYC coordination take?
The timeline follows how quickly project materials are ready, the selected provider’s queue and any follow-up questions. We can identify missing inputs at kickoff, but the provider controls its review schedule. We report the open actions and status rather than promise a completion date before the scope is confirmed.
Can you guarantee a KYC badge or platform approval?
No. A third-party provider issues its own KYC result, while the data site or launchpad decides whether and how to display or accept it. We commit to the coordination and submission work agreed in scope, not to a reviewer’s decision. We check the destination’s stated requirements before the handoff.
Can an existing audit report be used for a new contract deployment?
Only if the report’s scope accurately covers that deployment and the destination accepts the evidence. Share the report and current contract address for review. We will flag a scope mismatch for you to confirm with the auditor rather than describe an older report as covering new code.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…