What does a CryptoRank listing cover?
| Listing scope | Work covered |
|---|---|
| Project profile | Organize the project description, identity, and official references |
| Fundraising round | Prepare the round information supplied by your team |
| Submission support | Coordinate the materials and track the handoff |
A CryptoRank listing service prepares the information needed to present a project and its fundraising round on CryptoRank. It is suited to teams that want a coherent public profile, have source materials to verify, and can assign a contact to approve the final data.
The service is not a substitute for a project’s own records. Your team supplies the authoritative facts, including project details and round terms; we check that those facts are presented consistently and that the references lead to the intended sources. If an item is unknown or not ready to disclose, we mark it for a decision rather than filling the gap with an assumption.
This is distinct from a CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap submission: each platform has its own listing context and review. If you are planning several tracker profiles, compare the scope of CryptoRank and other tracker listings with CoinGecko listing support and CoinMarketCap listing support.
Which project details should be ready first?
| Prepare | Check before handoff |
|---|---|
| Project identity | Use the same project name and description across supplied materials |
| Official references | Confirm each website and social link is current and controlled by the project |
| Token information | Reconcile the details you intend to disclose with project records |
| Supporting material | Keep source documents available for questions or corrections |
A strong CryptoRank submission starts with a single approved source of truth. Before drafting, decide which description is canonical, which links are official, and who can confirm token and project information. Conflicting names, outdated links, and inconsistent wording slow review because the team must resolve them before it can approve a final pack.
We use a kickoff checklist to collect these inputs and flag gaps. The project contact reviews the consolidated profile before submission, so changes are handled while the working file is still easy to update. For broader directory planning, the listings and verification overview helps separate tracker submissions from verification and exchange work.
Prepare the facts in a shareable document, not scattered chat messages. Include a named owner for each item that may need confirmation. If a detail is confidential or not approved for publication, label it clearly and do not include it in the public-facing draft.
How should a fundraising round be presented?
| Round item | Team decision |
|---|---|
| Round identity | Confirm the round name and how it relates to the project’s funding history |
| Public details | Approve which terms and participants may be disclosed |
| Sources | Provide references that support the details you want presented |
| Updates | Identify the owner who can approve later corrections |
A fundraising-round listing needs a consistent account of what the project is prepared to make public. We organize the supplied round details into a clear draft, check that names and descriptions align with the project profile, and return questions where the evidence or wording does not match. The project team retains control of confidential details and final approval.
Before starting, decide whether the round information is ready to publish and whether all parties named in the materials can be referenced. If some terms are private, keep them out of the submission pack rather than leaving ambiguous blanks. The same discipline applies if the project has several funding events: distinguish each event using the records and wording your team approves.
If you are also preparing a separate financing or exchange outreach plan, keep those workstreams distinct. A tracker profile does not replace a centralized exchange listing plan or launchpad listing support.
What happens during the CryptoRank listing workflow?
| Stage | Output |
|---|---|
| Intake | A source-material checklist and named project contact |
| Review | Consolidated project and round draft with questions flagged |
| Approval | Your team’s sign-off on the information intended for submission |
| Handoff | Submission coordination and a record of the materials shared |
| Follow-up | Review of the public profile and notes on visible corrections |
The workflow is designed to keep factual approval with the project while making the submission pack easier to manage. AEOTech assigns an account contact to coordinate the checklist, collect answers, and maintain the version sent for approval. Your team receives a clear list of open items rather than an untracked series of edits.
The schedule begins when the required materials and project contact are available. Preparation can move forward once the source information is coherent; any clarification request or platform handling adds time outside the drafting stage. We do not treat submission as publication: the handoff and the public-record check are separate points in the work.
For a clean start, send the official project description, links, approved token information, round details, and any source documents you want considered. Identify who can sign off on public wording. If your profile needs a separate data correction on another tracker, consider circulating supply verification or contract migration and rebranding updates as a distinct task.
How do we check a CryptoRank profile after submission?
| Check | What we compare |
|---|---|
| Project identity | Public name and description against the approved draft |
| References | Visible links against the official links supplied by your team |
| Round details | Public round information against the approved submission materials |
| Corrections | Any visible mismatch recorded for follow-up |
After the submission handoff, we review the profile that is publicly visible and compare it with the approved information. This gives your team a practical record of what appeared and which details, if any, need attention. We share the result as a concise status note, with the relevant item and the source information needed to clarify it.
For reliable review, provide one final approved version and retain the source links used to prepare it. If your team updates a detail during the process, tell the account contact which version replaces the previous one. That avoids checking the public record against an outdated draft.
A profile review is also useful when planning related platform work. For example, CoinMarketCap community verification addresses a different profile task, while other crypto tracker listings can be scoped separately. Keep each platform’s materials and status notes distinct so your team can see exactly what has been submitted and checked.
What can CryptoRank decide after submission?
| Within the project’s control | Controlled by CryptoRank |
|---|---|
| Accuracy and consistency of supplied information | Whether a submission is accepted or how it is handled |
| Approval of public wording and references | Any review outcome or requested follow-up |
| Response to clarification requests | When or how a profile appears or is updated |
CryptoRank determines its review outcome, presentation, and handling of project or fundraising-round information; we cannot promise acceptance, a particular profile position, or a publication time. We commit to the agreed preparation, submission coordination, and visible-record review, and we report any platform response accurately.
To reduce avoidable back-and-forth, make sure project facts are verifiable from the materials you provide, use links your team controls, and approve the exact public-facing draft before handoff. If CryptoRank requests clarification, the project contact should answer from source records rather than introduce new wording without approval. Keep any requested revision aligned with the same source of truth used for the initial submission.
The practical decision rule is simple: proceed when the project identity, public references, and round information have an accountable owner. If these are still changing, first resolve the data and then commission the listing work.
Prices
| Service | Price | Quote |
|---|---|---|
| CryptoRank Listing | from $990 / project |
Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.
How it works
- Share the project packSend the current description, official links, approved token details, round information, and source materials. Name the person who can approve public wording.
- Resolve open data pointsWe flag inconsistent or missing information in the kickoff checklist. Your team confirms the facts or marks items that are not approved for disclosure.
- Approve the listing draftReview the consolidated project and fundraising-round information. Submission preparation proceeds after your designated contact signs off.
- Coordinate submissionWe organize the approved pack and coordinate its handoff, keeping a record of the materials shared and any follow-up.
- Review the visible recordWe compare the public profile with the approved information and provide a concise status note for your team.
Frequently asked questions
How much does a CryptoRank listing service cost?
The service price is from $990 / project. The scope covers preparation and coordination for the project and fundraising-round listing; the final work plan depends on the materials and related tasks you request. Share the project pack and we can identify the scope before work begins.
How long does a CryptoRank listing take?
Timing starts with the readiness of your materials and the time needed for your team to approve the draft. Platform handling and any clarification request affect when a profile appears or changes. We separate our preparation and handoff from the platform’s review, then check the public record.
What information do you need to prepare a CryptoRank profile?
Provide the project description, official links, approved token information, fundraising-round details, and any source materials supporting the facts you want made public. Also name a contact who can confirm details and approve wording. We use the kickoff checklist to flag anything inconsistent or not ready.
Can you list a fundraising round without publishing confidential terms?
Your team decides what is approved for public presentation. Tell us which details are confidential or not ready to disclose, and we will keep them out of the public-facing draft. The remaining information should still be consistent with the records and references supplied by your project.
Can you guarantee that CryptoRank will accept or publish the submission?
No. CryptoRank controls its review, acceptance, presentation, and timing, so acceptance or a particular publication outcome cannot be promised. We can commit to the agreed data preparation, submission coordination, and check of the public record, and we will report platform follow-up clearly.
Is CryptoRank listing the same as a CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap listing?
No. These are separate platform listing tasks, with separate submissions and public records. A CryptoRank project and round profile does not itself create a CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap profile. If you need more than one, scope each platform separately and keep its approved materials and follow-up notes organized.
What if the public CryptoRank profile has incorrect information?
Send the visible profile detail and the source information that shows the correction. We compare it with the approved submission materials, document the mismatch, and coordinate the appropriate follow-up. CryptoRank controls how it handles the request, so the public record should be checked again after any platform response.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…