Circulating Supply Verification for CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko

What does circulating-supply verification cover?

Circulating-supply verification documents how your project arrives at the figure it reports to a data platform. It is not simply a token total: the submission should explain the classification of balances and make the calculation traceable.

Start by listing every material allocation and its current status. Common items to review include vesting contracts, team or investor allocations, treasury wallets, ecosystem reserves, and tokens that have been burned. Do not label a balance as non-circulating solely because the project intends to hold it; document the actual restrictions or basis for your classification.

This service fits projects whose reported supply is missing, unclear, outdated, or inconsistent with public token information. If the project has changed contracts or token naming, address that context as part of the evidence pack and consider the related contract migration and rebranding update. For a broader view of listing and verification support, see Listings and verification.

How do we build a reviewable supply calculation?

A reviewable calculation connects the reported figure to identifiable balances and a stated method. We create a reconciliation that lets a reviewer follow the calculation without relying on unexplained assumptions.

We begin with the project’s existing token data, allocation schedule, contract references, and any prior supply disclosures. Then we flag gaps: an unlabeled wallet, a vesting balance with no schedule, or a public figure that does not match the supporting records. The project team confirms classifications and supplies missing evidence; we do not invent wallet labels or infer restrictions from an address alone.

Prepare materials in a form that can be checked: explorer links, contract details, vesting documentation, treasury records, and a short explanation of the relevant controls. The working file records the source and rationale for each adjustment. That makes later updates easier when tokens unlock, emissions change, or an allocation moves. Where a project also needs a general listing submission, we coordinate the supply materials with its CoinMarketCap listing or CoinGecko listing work.

How does the CoinGecko supply verification process work?

The CoinGecko supply verification process is a documented submission followed by review and, where requested, clarification. CoinMarketCap is handled as a separate platform submission, with its own materials and follow-up record.

1. Confirm the token identity, contract details, and currently displayed supply information.
2. Reconcile the project’s figures against the allocation and wallet evidence it can provide.
3. Prepare platform-specific explanations and supporting references.
4. Submit through the applicable project or listing contact route and track follow-up.

Before submission, check that the token name, ticker, network, contract address, and supply figures agree across the project’s public materials. If a figure has changed, explain why and identify the records that support the update. A reviewer should not have to guess whether two differently named wallets refer to the same allocation.

For CoinGecko, this is assistance with a supply report and related listing information; it is not a way to bypass the platform’s review. If the project is asking how to verify supply on CoinGecko, the practical answer is to provide a consistent calculation with evidence for the classifications it makes. Our team can also coordinate this work with a CoinGecko listing submission, so the supply explanation does not conflict with the wider project profile.

What will your project receive?

You receive a working supply file, an evidence index, and submission support for the agreed platforms. The goal is a pack that a reviewer can follow and your team can maintain after submission.

The kickoff checklist covers token identifiers, current supply disclosures, wallet and contract references, allocation or vesting records, burn information, and the project contact responsible for confirming classifications. We note missing evidence instead of presenting an unsupported conclusion as established fact.

If a platform asks for clarification, we help organize a direct response that points to the relevant row in the reconciliation and its evidence. We also flag adjacent profile issues that may require separate work, such as an inaccurate project description or token identity detail. For other verification needs, see CoinMarketCap community verification and listing profile remediation.

How long does supply verification take?

The work moves from document collection to reconciliation, submission preparation, and follow-up. The schedule is set after we see how complete the project’s records are and confirm which platforms are in scope.

The first useful milestone is a gap list, not a speculative submission date. It shows which records are ready, which classifications need a project decision, and what should be collected before the pack is finalized. A named project contact should be available to confirm treasury ownership, vesting status, and any internal allocation details that are not visible in public records.

AEOTech uses a documented review step before submission: we cross-check the final reported figure against the reconciliation and confirm that every exclusion has an explanation and evidence reference. You receive the current file and a concise status report, so the project can see what was submitted and what remains open. This is especially useful when supply information must be updated alongside a broader listing and verification plan.

What can CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko decide independently?

A complete evidence pack makes your explanation easier to assess, but each platform controls its own review and displayed data. Its reviewer may request clarification, interpret submitted evidence differently, or decide not to change a displayed supply figure; no agency can promise acceptance or a particular display outcome.

For that reason, keep the project’s source records and public disclosures aligned with the submitted calculation. If a platform declines a classification, preserve its response and update the project’s explanation rather than repeatedly submitting the same unsupported claim. When the issue is broader than supply, separate the supply evidence from profile corrections and other listing requests.

Use this preparation checklist before starting:

• Confirm the token’s network, contract address, name, and ticker.
• Gather the latest allocation, vesting, treasury, and burn records.
• Identify who can confirm each project-controlled wallet or restriction.
• Share the supply figure currently shown on each platform and the figure the project supports.

Send us those materials and identify whether CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, or both are in scope. We will review the records, return a focused gap list, and prepare the agreed submission pack.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Share token recordsSend contract details, current supply disclosures, allocation records, and the platform pages in scope. Name a project contact who can confirm internal wallet and vesting information.
2. Review evidence gapsWe check whether each material inclusion or exclusion has a clear rationale and supporting reference. You receive a focused list of missing or conflicting items.
3. Reconcile supplyWe organize the figures into a traceable model and ask your team to confirm classifications that depend on project records or decisions.
4. Prepare submissionsWe prepare platform-specific explanations and assemble the evidence pack for your review before submission.
5. Track follow-upWe log submitted materials and help organize factual responses to platform questions. You receive the updated file and status.